Is Triple H A Scapegoat For TKO?

Triple H has been working as WWE’s Chief Content Officer ever since TKO purchased WWE. 

Lately, the opinion has been that the program has become bland, and WWE has reduced the number of matches and live shows. So, the blame is placed upon The Game, given his position within the creative team.

However, is there a chance that Triple H isn’t actually the one making the decisions?

Triple H might be TKO’s scapegoat

On The Stevie Richards Show, Richards questioned whether Triple H was just delivering the message or was he making the decisions? Considering he has been in the industry and the inner circle to know how to book matches and storylines, it does not line up.

Let me ask you this question because we talk a lot about this stuff rolling downhill, and the agents or producers are basically the scapegoats for whoever’s above them, then those are, you know, there’s a lot of scapegoats where you can protect your spot. Is Triple H the scapegoat for TKO?

These decisions do not seem like a person like Triple H, who’s really been trained and groomed for this spot as well as having the inner circle knowledge and a killer Kowalsski student, and he’s got a great deal of real-world booking character, uh, and psychology experience. We can’t deny that. But at the same time, is he just the guy delivering the message? Is he James J. Dylan? Is he Jim Ross?

But I’m just saying, is he the bad cop in this? And will he eventually be the scapegoat, which he’s trying to counter by making himself as indispensable as possible?

Roman Reigns had acknowledged WWE’s leadership and had called out the creative side of the company. Given that one of WWE’s top superstars is voicing his opinion about the creative angles, could it be enough to replace Triple H?

Make TJR Wrestling your choice for news by clicking here.